Supreme Court Applies Fourth Amendment to Mass Location Data, Signaling Broader Surveillance Limits

Supreme Court Applies Fourth Amendment to Mass Location Data, Signaling Broader Surveillance Limits

The Supreme Court ruled geofence warrants unconstitutional without probable cause, particularity, and judicial preauthorization. The decision extends *Carpenter v. United States* (2018) logic from individual suspect tracking to population-scale searches. Investigators may still use geofence warrants meeting constitutional standards. The ruling leaves open whether Fourth Amendment protections extend to real-time monitoring, bulk queries beyond geofencing, and data held by non-traditional custodians.

Published

Read at another depth